I wrote the publisher/author of the article below, LegalInsurrection.com and Leslie Eastman, and asked for permission to post it here. It's amazing what happens when you do the right thing. Their reply? "That's fine. Thanks for asking." It's called a professional courtesy. Honoring the work of others.
I wanted to post it as written to give credit where credit is due AND because it was sooooo good to see that others are still banging away at the lie known as climate change. Don't forget though, it was originally called Global Warming, then Climate Disruption, and now Climate Change. There were other iterations, but I went through counseling to try and forget all their made up crap.
I dubbed it "Gorebal warming" years ago. It is a complete fabrication.
Here's a short list of reasons ...
- Al Gore's movie made up nearly everything in it. The Polar Bear struggling on the floating ice? Yeah, the photographer who took the photo has stated the bear was playing. Oh, and the population of said bear species is flourishing.
- The polar cap ice has not disappeared as was promised, by 2010.
- Many, if not most, of the official temperature reading stations are in populated urban cities, often on rooftops and adjacent to commercial air conditioning units (possibly the hottest spots outside Death Valley).
- I maintain most are confusing Carbon Dioxide (good) and Carbon Monoxide (bad) because too many (though not THAT many in reality) are scared our planet is dying.
- Some think our planet is naturally warming which, if true at all, is part of the cycle of earth and is terrific news because it is cold which kills people; farming and vegetation expand in warming.
- The people who claim this nonsense have not altered their lives at all.
So, here you go ... this could be a nail in the coffin if you share it.
Scientists Officially Declare End of ‘Climate Emergency’ During Prague Climate Conference
Climate Intelligence Group (Clintel) “calls upon the entire scientific community to cease and desist from its persecution of scientists and researchers who disagree with the current official narrative.”
Posted by Leslie Eastman Monday, November 25, 2024 at 10:00amdd
Legal Insurrection readers will recall that in my post on the United Nations climate conference in Azerbaijan this week, its president boldly declared that oil and gas were a ‘gift from God’.
The eco-activists attending the event were enraged.
The climate cultists will likely be working themselves up into even more hysteria because of another climate conference that occurred mid-November in the Czech Republic city of Prague.
The Czech division of the International Climate Intelligence Group (Clintel) organized a two-day climate conference in Prague on November 12-13, 2024, where climate scientists declared that the “climate emergency” is over. The conference concluded with a communiqué drafted by the participating scientists and researchers that targeted the climate hysteria promoted by the United Nations body, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
‘The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which excludes participants and published papers disagreeing with its narrative, fails to comply with its own error-reporting protocol and draws conclusions some of which are dishonest, should be forthwith dismantled.’
This declaration supports the conclusions of the major Clintel report, The Frozen Climate Views of the IPCC.
Moreover, the scientists at the conference declared that even if all nations moved straight to net zero emissions, by the 2050 target date the world would be only about 0.1 C cooler than with no emissions reduction.
So far, the attempts to mitigate climate change by international agreements such as the Paris Agreement have made no difference to our influence on climate, since nations such as Russia and China, India and Pakistan continue greatly to expand their combustion of coal, oil and gas.
The cost of achieving that 0.1 C reduction in global warming would be $2 quadrillion, equivalent to 20 years’ worldwide gross domestic product.
The declaration has 18 different point referencing climate science and facts that counter the narratives being pushed by the IPCC and those who want to push their green agendas. I have listed the first six below (which should be familiar to Legal Insurrection readers); there remainder can be found in the copy of the declaration.
1 The modest increase in the atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide that has taken place since the end of the Little Ice Age has been net-beneficial to humanity.
2. Foreseeable future increases in greenhouse gases in the air will probably also prove net-beneficial.
3. The rate and amplitude of global warming have been and will continue to be appreciably less than climate scientists have long predicted.
4. The Sun, and not greenhouse gases, has contributed and will continue to contribute the overwhelming majority of global temperature.
5. Geological evidence compellingly suggests that the rate and amplitude of global warming during the industrial era are neither unprecedented nor unusual.
6. Climate models are inherently incapable of telling us anything about how much global warming there will be or about whether or to what extent the warming has a natural or anthropogenic cause.
Though I have to say, #17 is a favorite of mine:
Since wind and solar power are costly, intermittent and more environmentally destructive per TWh generated than any other energy source, governments should cease to subsidize or to prioritize them, and should instead expand coal, gas and, above, all nuclear generation.
But, perhaps most importantly, the conference attendees demand the end of persecution of those researchers doing real science who struggle to share their reasonable and reliable findings whenever the data counters the political narratives.
Finally, the conference “calls upon the entire scientific community to cease and desist from its persecution of scientists and researchers who disagree with the current official narrative on climate change and instead to encourage once again the long and noble tradition of free, open and uncensored scientific research, investigation, publication and discussion”.
I would like to think that we soon will be able to reverse some of ideological capture of the sciences, especially climate science.